There are no clear references to
any particular individual as pastor/elder of any church in the New Testament. There
are instructions on qualifications, duties, warnings, and so forth, but no one
pastor/elder is specifically singled out for who he was or what he
accomplished. Some have argued that the exception was James, the half-brother
of Jesus and pastor of the church at Jerusalem. Was he? He is never called a pastor. He was a leader
in that church and spoke with authority in the council of Acts 15. His
authority was more likely due to his being an apostle (Galatians 1:19, possibly replacing James, the brother of
John martyred by Herod in Acts 12).
Paul responded somewhat negatively
to the hierarchy of authority in Jerusalem (Galatians 2:6, 9). He does so to
show that his ministry is not subject to the Jewish apostles or to any order
coming out of the Jewish church. On the contrary, Paul shows that these “leaders”
recognized and celebrated the authority of Paul’s apostleship to the Gentiles
by the grace of God (Galatians 2:7–10).
This information is given to
show that the contemporary church has strayed from the New Testament standard, exalting
the leadership of individuals. It is true that God calls certain to be leaders,
gifting them for ministry to feed and shepherd His people. However, the
emphasis is not on their personality but on their example of humble service to
the body for Christ. The tendency in the culture is to glorify persons as per the
Hollywood entertainment industry. Modern Christianity loves celebrating
celebrity pastors, and this practice is wrong.
Jim Elliff gives the following
reasons why he believes that no church in the New Testament is notable for its
pastor:
1. There were multiple pastors
in the local churches making up a team of elders.
2. Others within the body of
believers shared in the verbal ministry that was designed to strengthen the
believers, though elders were to be skilled in teaching with a main
responsibility to shepherd the believers as exemplary designated leaders.
3. The churches were subdivided
into homes or apartments (insula) so that no one elder became known for being
the church’s primary teacher and leader for the whole.
Elliff followed up by commenting:
These patterns eventually
changed, and the churches became more institutionalized so that single leaders
became prominent above the others.
As far as I can tell, how the
churches today structure their lives together is not mandated in the New
Testament though the precedent is well-defined. God has used both. It is up to
the churches to determine the way they will proceed. I am explaining the
reasons why I believe early New Testament believers didn’t designate their
churches by the name of a pastor as we do. (They attend ———’s Church.) *
God has used the pastor-led
model for many years; however, that model is fraught with many dangers to both
church and pastor. Would not the church be better served by returning to the early
church practice of anonymous pastoral servanthood, glorifying Christ and not
men?
*Jim Elliff, Christian
Communicator’s Worldwide (https://www.ccwtoday.org), Facebook post, August 7,
2018.